Pretty sure it instantly swept the Razzies based on the trailer alone.They better not change CATS due to the backlash. I NEED this trainwreck as is.
Most definitely the sum of this movie. And while I get that, I'm not sure it delivers anything of worth to me. So, there are fortunate souls out there who live this life. They are very few and far between. Seems like a fun ride and most often by pure luck or accident. Its not something to aspire to, nor do I find it redeeming in anyway as he did next to nothing to deserve it.I don't think it ever mattered to him. The closest thing you'll get to an answer is probably this quote:
![]()
Failing upwards is very timely.
I believe you're overthinking the movie. It's an elevated stoner comedy featuring Final Boss McConnaughey navigating the weirdest group of supporting characters I've seen this century. It's a one-liner fest. I mean it's barely even a movie. I laughed so hard at Martin Lawrence's Captain Wack I nearly threw up. No spoilers though.Most definitely the sum of this movie. And while I get that, I'm not sure it delivers anything of worth to me. So, there are fortunate souls out there who live this life. They are very few and far between. Seems like a fun ride and most often by pure luck or accident. Its not something to aspire to, nor do I find it redeeming in anyway as he did next to nothing to deserve it.
So I guess I'm supposed to dislike him but his charms supercedes that?
My AMC didn't get the movie in time for my 4pm showing. Looks like it's a clusterfuck elsewhere as well. Heading in to the 7 showing now.The theater I’m at is having projector issues. Going to show in digital so not a total loss but still.
Yeah, I had good feeling I knew how the ending would go down early on, but it didn't really matter. That's what I love about some of his movies. The plot is just there because one has to be - it's more about enjoying the journey. It's just fun to hang out with the characters. As someone who is obsessed with the Manson murders and Tarantino, it was both impossible to reach expectations and impossible for me to hate if that makes any sense. The end of the 60s/beginning of the 70s Hollywood (and the US at large) is such and interesting period that's not often explored. The way I feel right now, I'd slot Once Upon a Time... into my personal top four, but I really need to see it again before I can fully, personally rank them. Pulp Fiction will always be number 1 with a bullet. It's my favorite movie, after all. That has a lot to do with me being 16 when it came out and it blowing my mind (saw it in the theater at least five times into late spring/early summer '95) and becoming a huge part of my cultural experience for several of the years that followed. It still holds up to me on rewatch, though.Once Upon a Time. . . in Hollywood - 8.5/10
My favorite Tarantino movies have always been the first four: Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, and the Kill Bills. I guess I prefer the more lighthearted Q style than the more recent stuff he's done. Not that Django and Hateful Eight are bad but they are so dour at points I haven't revisited them nearly as often as his other work. Well, Tarantino has finally made something that fits in more with his first act. OUATIH is the fun, ultra-hip, pop-culture obsessed Tarantino I fell in love with.
It could be said that every movie he's done is a throwback in one way or another. His love for old Hollywood has been apparent from the beginning so it makes sense that he would make a movie that is literally a love letter to Hollywood's golden age. His obsession with westerns continues here; not only is his main character a prolific western film star, but the plot sort of plays out like an aging gunfighter movie that would star Gregory Peck or something. While I called Hateful Eight a 'greatest hits', OUATIH hits a bunch of Tarantino's favorite motifs, with enough shots of feet, driving, record player needle drops, and Red Apple cigarettes to fit into his larger weirdo canon. The wall-to-wall period soundtrack hits the mark 100% of the time.
Both DiCaprio and Pitt should see award season recognition but with both parts being so equal, I don't know which qualifies as lead. Their chemistry is magical, really selling the bromance at the center of the film. If I had to pick between them, I would give the nudge to Pitt's performance if only because his Cliff character is given more to play with on the fringes of the L.A. scene. His scene with Bruce Lee (played by a pitch perfect Mike Moh) was probably my favorite of the movie. I'm convinced Margaret Qualley is a star in the making after this, Fosse/Verdon, and Donnybrook all this year. Austin Butler as the menacing Tex Watson and Bruce Dern also have very memorable bit parts. Phenomenal ensemble cast.
I am very interested to see how divisive Once Upon a Time ... In Hollywood is to both Q fans and the public in general. I suspect a fondness of old movies is required to draw you into the story, otherwise the stakes seem fairly low. The 'danger' seemingly around the corner is in the viewer's mind, knowing the inevitability of the well known part of the story. But this movie isn't really about that. It's a quirky story about the bonds of friendship in the weird world of 60's Hollywood that only Tarantino could tell.